Author Archive

High Performance Computing by Any Other Name Smells So Sweet

March 29th, 2012
Taken from the ISC HPC Blog, by Peter Ffoulkes

This month, the annual HPC Advisory Council meeting took place in Switzerland, stirring many discussions about the future of big data, and the available and emerging technologies slated to solve the inundation of data on enterprises.

On the ISC blog, Peter Ffoulkes from TheInfoPro writes that the enterprise is finally starting to discover that HPC is the pathway to success, especially when it comes to Big Data Analytics.

“Going back to fundamentals, HPC is frequently defined as either compute intensive or data intensive computing or both. Welcome to today’s hottest commercial computing workload, “Total Data” and business analytics. As described by 451 Research, “Total Data” involves processing any data that might be applicable to the query at hand, whether that data is structured or unstructured, and whether it resides in the data warehouse, or a distributed Hadoop file system, or archived systems, or any operational data source – SQL or NoSQL – and whether it is on-premises or in the cloud.”

According to Ffoulkes, the answer to the total data question will remain in HPC. This week, many of us attended the OpenFabrics Alliance User and Developer Workshop and discussed these same topics: enterprise data processing needs, cloud computing, big data, and while the event has ended, I hope the discussions continue as we look to the future of big data.

In the meantime, be sure to check out Peter’s thoughts in his full blog post.

Jim Ryan

Jim Ryan

Author: admin Categories: InfiniBand Tags:

RoCE and InfiniBand: Which should I choose?

February 13th, 2012

The IBTA wrapped up the four part fall Webinar Series in December, and if you didn’t have the opportunity to attend these events live, there is a recorded version available on the IBTA’s website.  In the webinar series, we suggested the idea that it makes sense to take a fresh look at I/O in light of recent developments in I/O and data center architecture. We took a high level look at two RDMA technologies which were InfiniBand and a relative new comer called RoCE - RDMA over Converged Ethernet . 

RDMA is an interesting network  technology that has been dominant in the HPC marketplace for quite a while and is now finding increasing application in modern commercial data centers, especially in performance sensitive environments or environments that depend on an agile, cost constrained approach to computing, for example almost any form of cloud computing.  So it’s no surprise that several questions arose during the webinar series about the differences between a “native” InfiniBand RDMA fabric and one based on RoCE.   In a nutshell, the questions boiled down to this:  What can InfiniBand do that RoCE cannot?  If I start down the path of deploying RoCE, why not simply stick with it, or should I plan to migrate to IB?”

As a quick review, RoCE is a new technology that is best thought of as a network that delivers many of the advantages of RDMA, such as lower latency or improved CPU utilization, but using a Ethernet switched fabric instead of InfiniBand adapters and switches.  This is illustrated in the diagram below.  Conceptually, RoCE is simple enough, but there is a subtlety that is easy to overlook.  Many of us, when we think of Ethernet, naturally envision the complete IP architecture consisting of TCP, IP and Ethernet.  But the truth is that RoCE bears no relationship to traditional TCP/IP/Ethernet, even though it uses an Ethernet layer.  The diagram also compares the two RDMA technologies to traditional TCP/IP/Ethernet.   As the drawing makes clear, RoCE and InfiniBand are sibling technologies, but are only distant cousins to TCP/IP/Ethernet.   Indeed, RoCE’s heritage is found in the basic InfiniBand architecture and is fully supported by the open source software stacks provided by the Open Fabrics Alliance.  So if it’s possible to use Ethernet and still harvest the benefits of RDMA, what’s to choose between the two?   Naturally, there are trade-offs to be made.



During the webinar we presented the following chart as a way to illustrate some of the trade-offs that one might encounter in choosing an I/O architecture.  The first column shows a pure Ethernet approach, as is common in most data centers today.  In this scenario, the data center rides the wave of improvements in Ethernet speeds.  Naturally, using traditional TCP/IP/Ethernet, you don’t get any of the RDMA advantages.   For this blog, our interest is mainly in the middle and right hand columns which focus on the two alternate implementations of RDMA technology.  


From the application perspective both RoCE and native InfiniBand present the same API and provide about the same sets of services.  So what are the differences between them?  They really break down into four distinct areas. 

  • Wire speed and the bandwidth roadmap. The roadmap for Ethernet is maintained by the IEEE and is designed to suit the needs of a broad range of applications ranging from home networks to corporate LANs to data center interconnects and even wide area networking. Naturally, each type of application has unique requirements and different speed requirements. For example, client networking does not have the speed requirements that are typical of a data center application. Of this wide range of applications the Ethernet roadmap naturally tends to reflect the bulk of its intended market, even though speed grades more representative of data center needs (40 and 100GbE) have recently been introduced. The InfiniBand roadmap on the other hand, is maintained by the InfiniBand Trade Association and has one focus, which is to be the highest performance data center interconnect possible. Commodity InfiniBand components (NICs and switches) at 40Gb/s have been in wide distribution for several years now, and a new 56Gb/s speed grade has recently been announced. Although the InfiniBand and Ethernet roadmaps are slowly converging, it is still true that the InfiniBand bandwidth roadmap leads the Ethernet roadmap. So if bandwidth is a serious concern, you would probably want to think about deploying an InfiniBand fabric.  ib-roadmap

                      InfiniBand Speed Roadmap

  •  Adoption curve. Historically, next generation Ethernet has been deployed first as a backbone (switch-to-switch) technology and eventually trickled down to the end nodes. 10GbE was ratified in 2002, but until 2007 almost all servers connected to the Ethernet fabric using 1GbE, with 10GbE reserved for the backbone. The same appears to be true for 40 and 100GbE; although the specs were ratified by the IEEE in 2010, an online search for 40GbE NICs reveals only one 40GbE NIC product in the marketplace today. Server adapters for InfiniBand on the other hand, are ordinarily available coincident with the next announced speed bump allowing servers to connect to an InfiniBand network at the very latest speed grades right away. 40Gb/s InfiniBand HCAs, known as QDR, have been available for a number of years now, and new adapter products matching the next roadmap speed bump, known as FDR, were announced at SC11 this past fall. The important point here is that one trade-off to be made in deciding between RoCE and native InfiniBand is that RoCE allows you to preserve your familiar Ethernet switched fabric, but at the price of a slower adoption curve compared to native InfiniBand.
  • Fabric management. RoCE and InfiniBand both offer many of the features of RDMA, but there is a fundamental difference between an RDMA fabric built on Ethernet using RoCE and one built on top of native InfiniBand wires. The InfiniBand specification describes a complete management architecture based on a central fabric management scheme which is very much in contrast to traditional Ethernet switched fabrics, which are generally managed autonomously. InfiniBand’s centralized management architecture, which gives its fabric manager a broad view of the entire layer 2 fabric, allows it to provide advanced fabric features such as support for arbitrary layer 2 topologies, partitioning, QoS and so forth. These may or may not be important in any particular environment, but by avoiding the limitations of the traditional spanning tree protocol, InfiniBand fabrics can maximize bi-sectional bandwidth and thereby take full advantage of the fabric capacity. That’s not to say that there are not proprietary solutions in the Ethernet space, or that there is no work underway to improve Ethernet management schemes, but again, if these features are important in your environment, that may impact your choice of native InfiniBand compared to an Ethernet-based RoCE solution. So when choosing between an InfiniBand fabric and a RoCE fabric, it makes sense to consider the management implications.
  • Link level flow control vs. DCB. RDMA, whether native InfiniBand or RoCE, works best when the underlying wires implement a so-called lossless fabric. A lossless fabric is one where packets on the wire are not routinely dropped. By comparison, traditional Ethernet is considered a lossy fabric since it frequently drops packets, relying on the TCP transport layer to notice these lost packets and to adjust for them. InfiniBand, on the other hand, uses a technique known as link level flow control, which ensures that packets are not dropped in the fabric except in the case of serious errors. This technique helps explain much of InfiniBand’s traditionally high bandwidth utilization efficiency. In other words, you get all the bandwidth for which you’ve paid. When using RoCE, you can accomplish almost the same thing by deploying the latest version of Ethernet sometimes known as Data Center Bridging, or DCB. DCB comprises five new specifications from the IEEE which taken together provide almost the same lossless characteristic as InfiniBand’s link level flow control. But there’s a catch; to get the full benefit of DCB requires that your switches and NICs implement the important parts of these new IEEE specifications. I would be very interested to hear from anybody who has experience with these new features in terms of how complex they are to implement in products, how well they work in practice, and if there are any special management challenges.

As we pointed out in the webinars, there are many practical routes to follow on the path to an RDMA fabric.  In some environments, it is entirely likely that RoCE will be the ultimate destination, providing many of the benefits of RDMA technology while preserving major investments in existing Ethernet.  In some other cases, RoCE presents a great opportunity to become familiar with RDMA on the way toward implementing the highest performance solution based on InfiniBand.  Either way, it makes sense to understand some of these key differences in order to make the best decision going forward.

If you didn’t get a chance to attend any of the webinars or missed one of the parts, be sure to check out the recording here on the IBTA website.  Or, if you have any lingering questions about the webinars or InfiniBand and RoCE, email me at






Paul Grun
System Fabric Works

Author: admin Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

InfiniBand: What about it ?

February 10th, 2012

Recently, there has been a lot of conversation around InfiniBand. Members of the IBTA often take our knowledge of InfiniBand technology for granted, which is why we are happy to see more exploratory discussion and education conversations happening. If you’re interested in finding out more about InfiniBand the IBTA has a number of resources for you to check out, including a product roadmap, put together by the IBTA’s members.

Additionally, we wanted to share a recent blog post by Oracle’s Neeraj Gupta, which succinctly introduces the InfiniBand technology to those who may be unfamiliar with it.

Looking forward to more discussion and education on InfiniBand in the coming weeks.

Brian Sparks and Skip Jones
IBTA Marketing Working Group Co-Chairs

InfiniBand: What about it ?

Heard the buzz word - InfiniBand ? And wondering what it is ? Here is some information to get you started.

I am quite sure that you are already familiar with more common networking technologies like Ethernet and various Wireless media these days. InfiniBand is yet another but it does not reach out to us in our daily lives as much as others and probably thats the reason you are still interested in reading about it here :)

InfiniBand is meant to provide interconnect for high end computing environments by providing high bandwidth under extremely low latency. In other words, it enables computing end points to exchange more data, faster. Lets compare InfiniBand with Ethernet based on various product offerings today.

Ethernet most commonly offer 1Gb/sec and 10Gb/sec bandwidth. InfiniBand offer upto 40Gb/s bandwidth with lower latency then observed on Ethernet media.

I would like to point out that these are raw bandwidths and the actual throughput is usually lower which depends on messaging protocols across end points. I will talk about this more later.

In recent years of technology evolution, computing platforms’ capabilities have reached a point where they can use a better and higher speed network to communicate with peer platforms more efficiently. We refer to the term - bottlenecks, when such scenarios occur. In high demanding computing environments, InfiniBand solves this problem by allowing computers to exchange more data faster.

So, what do you need to get on this high speed data highway ? Not likely that same equipment will work. You are right !

InfiniBand requires specialized hardware equipment. Each computing end point needs an I/O card that we call as Host Channel Adapter or HCA. They connect to InfiniBand Switches using special cables that are engineered to carry your data at this high rate with precision.

Oh wow ! So, do I need to re-write my applications here ? I do not have time to do that !

I know you will ask this at this point. The answer is “no”. Before I go any further, let me just state that InfiniBand follows well known industry standard for networking and this is known as Open Systems Interconnect or OSI. This model offers seven layers and just like ethernet, they apply to InfiniBand as well. Now, let me come back to the original point. We dont need to re-write our entire applications because InfiniBand technology enables very seamless integration.

The new hardware that we just talked about integrates and presents itself to your application in a very similar way as Ethernet. Your view into the network remains same and you continue to interact with sockets comprised of IP addresses and ports.

Thats all for this blog. I will come back with more information on this later and open up the topic in details. Thanks for reading !

*Reposted with permission from Oracle’s Networking Blog and Neeraj Gupta

Author: admin Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

Statement from QLogic

February 6th, 2012

Recently, QLogic Corporation sold Intel Corporation the QLogic InfiniBand business unit. QLogic continues its focus and expansion of its Ethernet product-line, as well as RoCE and iWARP protocols, amongst others, over Ethernet. QLogic remains committed to its close relationships and positions within the IBTA.








Skip Jones
IBTA Marketing Working Group Co-Chair

Author: admin Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

2012 Outlook from the MWG Chairs

January 20th, 2012

As we begin 2012, the InfiniBand Trade Association is not only looking back on our successes in 2011, but also mapping out our areas for growth in the coming year. In 2011, the IBTA:

And this is just a slice of 2011!

Exciting things are to come in 2012 including: an update to our minibook, more discussions/events around RoCE, and so much more. As we look to the future of InfiniBand, we want to broaden the InfiniBand story beyond the HPC into the enterprise, highlighting real-life deployments and showcasing the great work of our members. We know various market-verticals utilize InfiniBand in their storage solutions, such as financial services, cloud computing and manufacturing, and this year we plan to increase the visibility of these solutions by reaching out to you, our members, and spreading your success stories.

We look forward to the year ahead with the IBTA and the continued support and participation of our members.

Happy New Year!

Brian Sparks and Skip Jones


Author: admin Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

3M Gearing Up for SC11

November 10th, 2011

With the SC11 show less than a week away, we at 3M are gearing up and getting excited about what we have to share with the IBTA community. The high-speed twin axial cable and active optical cable (AOC) teams haven’t wasted any time by quickly identifying ways to contribute to the working groups and working to bring the best of 3M processes and innovation to the table. Coupled with access to IBTA’s resources, our support and rapidly growing portfolio of high-speed products will continue to expand and evolve.

This week, our 3M engineers are currently at IBTA Plugfest #20 with a full suite of complementary copper and fiber products for FDR, QDR and DDR rates, ranging in lengths from 0.5 meters up to 100 meters. And this momentum continues as we head into SC11.

3M is a sponsor of the IBTA/OFA booth, where we’ll be showcasing our various high-speed products for the HPC segment. What we have to offer in this space is truly differentiated and we believe can meet the most demanding of our customers’ needs.

For example, our line of copper QSFP+ assemblies are made with 3MTM Twin Axial Cable technology, which lets the cable assembly easily bend and fold, allowing the cable to achieve a very small bend radius (2.5mm) with little to no impact on electrical performance.

The cable is lightweight and low profile (flat ribbon format) as well, and together with its unique flexibility, enables very efficient routing and improved airflow. Imagine folding the cable at a right angle right off the backshell where it exits the switch. Honestly, it’s a bit hard to envision without seeing it in action, so check out the cable and its capabilities on our YouTube page!

We’ll also be leveraging our presence at SC11 to showcase our AOC assemblies - one of the lowest power AOCs available on the market. Up there in flexibility with the 3M Twin Ax assemblies, our AOCs utilize a low-loss, bend-insensitive fiber, meaning the flexibility and high-performance benefits of 3M copper QSFP+ assemblies extends to the fiber side, as well.

These and other 3M cables will be put to the test in the 40 Gbps RDMA live demonstration within the IBTA/OFA booth. So, if you’re going to be at SC11, the demo should not be missed as it’s an extraordinary 40Gbps RDMA demo over this kind of distance… 6,000 miles, further than a trip from Seattle to Paris!

3M will be in Seattle all week during SC11 with a full agenda, so make sure you stop by the IBTA/OFA booth and check out our latest technologies. We’ll also be meeting with customers one-on-one in our meeting suite at the Grand Hyatt. The countdown is on and we look forward to seeing you at the show. Feel free to e-mail us for more information or to schedule time to chat at SC11.

Shalou Dhamija,

Jeff Bullion,

Author: admin Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

SC11 Just One Week Away; Great Content Planned for IBTA & OFA Booth #6010

November 7th, 2011

With less than two weeks until SC11, there’s lots of buzz around the forthcoming November release of the TOP500 list. Will Japan’s K supercomputer stay at the top? Where will China’s Sunway Bluelight place? How many systems with GPUs will we see?

The TOP500 list plays into SC11’s unofficial theme of Big Data. Nicole Hemsoth of HPCwire, released an article last week providing highlights of what you can expect to see at SC11. Nicole sites John Johnson, conference chair, who says that this year the supercomputing community is “being called upon to rise to the data challenge and develop methods for dealing with the exponential growth of data and strategies for analyzing and storing large data sets.”

Nicole goes on to highlight a number of presentations and sessions being given at SC11 focused on the problems and new developments spawned by Big Data and technical or scientific computing.

The technical working groups of the IBTA and OFA are all about addressing the problems and new developments spawned by data challenges in high performance computing - and translating those technologies into meaningful solutions for the enterprise data center.

We have joined forces with several member companies as well as SC11’s SCinet and Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) and will be showcasing a “world’s first” demonstration of Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA) protocols over a 40 Gbps WAN. Watch here for more details to be released this Monday, Nov. 14.

We will also be featuring presentations from member companies on a full range of topics detailed on this site.

Be sure to add the IBTA/OFA #6010 to your list of must-see booths at the show and watch this space for live updates from the show.


Brian Sparks

IBTA Marketing Working Group Co-Chair

Author: admin Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

Why I/O is Worth a Fresh Look

October 5th, 2011

In September, I had the privilege of working with my friend and colleague, Paul Grun of System Fabric Works (SFW) on the first webinar in a four-part series, “Why I/O is Worth a Fresh Look,” presented by InfiniBand Trade Association on September 23.

The IBTA Fall Webinar Series is part of a planned outreach program led by the IBTA to expand InfiniBand technology to new areas where its capabilities may be especially useful. InfiniBand is well-accepted in the High-Performance Community (HPC), but the technology can be just as beneficial in “mainstream” Enterprise Data Centers (EDC). The webinar series addresses the role of remote direct memory access (RDMA) technologies, such as InfiniBand and RDMA over Converged Ethernet (RoCE), in the EDC, highlighting the rising importance of I/O technology in the on-going transformation of modern data centers. We know that broadening into EDC is a difficult task for several reasons, including the fact that InfiniBand could be viewed as a “disruptive” technology, not based on the familiar Ethernet transport, and therefore requires new components in the EDC. The benefits are certainly there, but so are the challenges, hence the difficulty of our task.

Like all new technologies, one of our challenges is educating those who are not familiar with InfiniBand and challenging them to look at their current systems differently – just as our first part in this webinar series suggests - taking a fresh look at I/O. In this first webinar, we took on the task of reexamining I/O and assessing genuine advancements in I/O, specifically InfiniBand and making case for how this technology should be considered when improving your data center. We believe the developments in the InfiniBand world over the last decade are not well-known to EDC managers, or at least not well understood.

I am very happy with the result, and the first webinar really set the stage for the next three webinars which dive into the nuts and bolts of this technology and give practical information on how this technology can be implemented and improve your data center.

During the webinar we answered several questions, but one in particular, I felt we did not spend enough time discussing due to time limitations. The attendee asked, “How will interoperability in the data center be assured? The results from the IBTA plugfests are less than impressive. Will this improve with the next generation FDR product?”

First, this question requires a little explanation, because it uses terminology and implies knowledge outside of the webinar itself. There is testing of InfiniBand components which takes place jointly between the IBTA and OpenFabrics Alliance (OFA) at the University of New Hampshire Interoperability Lab (UNH-IOL). We test InfiniBand components for compliance to the InfiniBand specification and for interoperability with other compliant InfiniBand components.

In the opinion of IBTA and OFA members, vendors and customers alike, interoperability must be verified with a variety of vendors and their products. However, that makes the testing much more difficult and results in lower success rates than if a less demanding approach were to be taken. The ever-increasing data rates also put additional demands on cable vendors and InfiniBand Channel Adapter and Switch vendors.

The real world result of our testing is a documented pass rate of about 90%, and a continuing commitment to do better.

What this means in real world terms is that the InfiniBand community has achieved the most comprehensive and strictest compliance and interoperability program in the industry. This fact, in and of itself, is probably the strongest foundational element that justifies our belief that InfiniBand can and should be considered for adoption in the mainstream EDC, with complete confidence as to its quality, reliability and maturity.

If you were unable to attend the webinar, be sure to check out the recorded webinar and download the presentation slides here. We’re looking forward to the next webinar (The Practical Approach to Applying InfiniBand in Your Data Center, taking place October 21) in the series which will dig more deeply into how this technology can be integrated into the data center and get into the meat of this technology. I look forward to your participation in the remaining webinars. There’s a lot we can accomplish together, and it starts with this basic understanding of the technology and how it can help you reach your company’s goals.

Jim Ryan
Chairman of the OpenFabrics Alliance

Author: admin Categories: InfiniBand, Uncategorized Tags:

InfiniBand at VMworld!

September 2nd, 2011

VMworld 2011 took place this week in sunny Las Vegas, and with over 20,000 attendees, this show has quickly developed into one of the largest enterprise IT events in the world. Virtualization continues to be one of the hottest topics in the industry, providing a great opportunity for InfiniBand vendors to market the wide-array of benefits that InfiniBand is enabling in virtualized environments. There were several in the IBTA community spreading the InfiniBand message, but here were a few of note.


On the networking side, Mellanox Technologies showed the latest generation of InfiniBand technology, FDR 56Gb/s. With FDR adapters, switches and cables available today, IT managers can immediately deploy this next generation technology into their data center and get instant performance improvements, whether it be leading vMotion performance, the ability to support more virtual machines per server at higher bandwidth per virtual machine, or higher capital and lower operating expenses by consolidating the networking, management and storage I/O into a one-wire infrastructure.


Fusion-io, a Flash-based storage manufacturer that targets heavy data acceleration needs from such applications as database, virtualization, Memchached and VDI, also made a big splash at VMworld. Their booth featured an excellent demonstration of how low-latency, high-speed InfiniBand networks help enable Fusion-io to show 800 virtual desktops being accessed and displayed over 17 monitors. InfiniBand enabled them to stream bandwidth-intensive HD movies (over 2,000) from just eight servers.


Pure Storage, a newcomer in the storage arena, announced their 40Gb/s InfiniBand-based enterprise storage array that targets applications such as database, VDI, etc. With InfiniBand they are able to reduce their latency by over 800 percent while increasing performance by 10X.


Isilon was recently acquired by EMC, and in the EMC booth, a rack of Isilon storage systems was displayed, scaling out by running 40Gb/s InfiniBand on the back-end. These storage systems excel in VDI implementations and are ripe for customers implementing a cloud solution where performance, reliability and storage resiliency are vital.


Also exhibiting at VMworld was Xsigo Systems. Xsigo showed their latest Virtual I/O Director which now includes 40Gb/s InfiniBand. The previous generation used 20Gb/s InfiniBand. With the upgraded bandwidth capabilities, Xsigo can now offer their customers with 12-30X acceleration of I/O intensive tasks such as vMotion, queries, backup, etc all while providing dynamic bandwidth allocation per VM or job. In addition, by consolidating the network over a single wire, Xsigo is able to provide customers with 85 percent less hardware cost per virtual machine.

The items mentioned above are just a small slice of the excitement that was at VMworld. I’m glad to have seen so many InfiniBand solutions displayed. For more information on InfiniBand in the enterprise, watch for an upcoming webinar series being produced by the IBTA.

Brian Sparks

IBTA Marketing Working Group Co-Chair

HPC Advisory Council Showcases World’s First FDR 56Gb/s InfiniBand Demonstration at ISC’11

July 1st, 2011

The HPC Advisory Council, together with ISC’11, showcased the world’s first demonstration of FDR 56Gb/s InfiniBand in Hamburg, Germany, June 20-22. The HPC Advisory Council is hosting and organizing new technology demonstrations at leading HPC conferences around the world to highlight new solutions which will influence future HPC systems in term of performance, scalability and utilization.

The 56Gb/s InfiniBand demonstration connected participating exhibitors on the ISC’11 showroom floor as part of the HPC Advisory Council ISCnet network. The ISCnet network provided organizations with fast interconnect connectivity between their booths.

The FDR InfiniBand network included dedicated and distributed clusters, as well as a Lustre-based storage system. Multiple applications were demonstrated, including high-speed visualization applications using car models courtesy of Peugeot Citroën.

The installation of the fiber cables (we used 20 and 50 meter cables) was completed a few days before the show opened, and we placed the cables on the floor, protecting them with wooden bridges. The clusters, Lustre and application setup was done the day before and everything ran perfectly.

You can see the network architecture of the ISCnet FDR InfiniBand demo below. We have combined both MPI traffic and storage traffic (Lustre) on the same fabric, utilizing the new bandwidth capabilities to provide a high performance, consolidated fabric for the high speed rendering and visualization application demonstration.


The following HPC Council member organizations contributed to the FDR 56Gb/s InfiniBand demo and I would like to personally thank each of them: AMD, Corning Cable Systems, Dell, Fujitsu, HP, MEGWARE, Mellanox Technologies, Microsoft, OFS, Scalable Graphics, Supermicro and Xyratex.


Gilad Shainer

Member of the IBTA and chairman of the HPC Advisory Council